Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432857›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2025

Are Routine Post-Cast Removal Radiographs and a Second Follow-up Appointment Necessary in the Management of Nondisplaced or Minimally Displaced Distal Radius Fractures?

Brian Molokwu, Fareeda Eraky, Matthew Weintraub, Ian Briggs, Candice Legister, Katie Otero, Neil Kaushal, Alice Chu, Folorunsho Edobor-Osula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brian MolokwuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Fareeda ErakyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Matthew WeintraubDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Ian BriggsDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Candice LegisterDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Katie OteroDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Neil KaushalDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Alice ChuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Folorunsho Edobor-OsulaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of routine follow-up radiographs and appointments after cast removal when managing minimally displaced pediatric distal radius fractures has not been conclusively proven. This study aims to assess how often follow-up appointments and radiographs taken after cast removal alter management of patients with minimally displaced distal radius fractures. Methods: A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted on patients under 18 years of age with minimally displaced distal radius fractures between 2017 and 2023. Demographic information, fracture characteristics, time to follow-up, and each appointment outcome were recorded. A change in patient management following post-cast removal radiographs was defined as a need for closed reduction, operative intervention, or prolonged immobilization. The second follow-up appointment was considered to modify management if it necessitated a physical therapy referral or an additional office visit. Unscheduled appointments and any changes in fracture alignment during follow-up visits were also noted. Results: Ninety-three patients met the inclusion criteria; 1.1% (1 of 93) of patients had their management changed following their post-cast removal radiographs according to our criteria. One patient was indicated for prolonged immobilization for a visible fracture line; no patients were indicated for surgery or closed reduction. Thirty-eight patients who underwent cast removal attended their 2nd follow-up appointment; 2.6% (1 of 38) of patients had their management changed according to our criteria. One patient required an additional follow-up appointment for a physeal check; no patient required a physical therapy referral. Two patients had an unscheduled appointment after discharge of care, due to parental desire of recovery confirmation before returning to gym play. No changes in fracture alignment were observed during any follow-up radiographs. Conclusions: This study suggests that post-cast removal radiographs and second follow-up appointments rarely alter management of minimally displaced distal radius fractures. Limiting unnecessary visits and imaging could reduce costs and ease the burden on patients and families. Key Concepts: 1) Post-cast removal radiographs rarely altered management for minimally displaced pediatric distal radius fractures.2) Only 1.1% of patients required prolonged immobilization, with no cases needing surgery or closed reduction.3) Second follow-up appointments infrequently changed management, with only 2.6% of patients requiring an additional visit.4) Unscheduled visits were primarily driven by parental concerns rather than clinical necessity.5) No changes in fracture alignment were observed in any follow-up radiographs. Level of Evidence: Level IV - case series.

Indexed as

CastFollow-upFractureImagingPediatricsRadiographs

Identifiers

PMID40432857
PMCPMC12088205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.