ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025
Circus-specific extension of the 6th International Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modified Maddocks Questions Tool in Spanish: evaluating comprehension among child soccer players aged 4-8.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Sex differences in fixational eye movements following concussion.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- The Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) for Postural Control Assessment/Training - a Decade of Research.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While sport-related concussion (SRC) is a known risk in circus arts, no published guidelines exist to guide post-concussion return to circus, contributing to inadequate management in this population. The Concussion in Sport Group (CISG) published the 6th international consensus statement in 2023, providing updated guidance and assessment tools for the management of SRC. Sport and dance organisations have adapted these recommendations for their specific settings. The aim of this extension statement was to extend the CISG guideline to the circus arts training and performance context. Development included a review of literature, creation of the initial drafts by the working group, feedback from external reviewers and integration of the feedback into a final draft approved by the working group. This statement includes circus-specific recommendations for: (1) baseline testing; (2) immediate postinjury management including adapted Maddocks questions; (3) a criterion-based return-to-circus progression including guidance by circus discipline; (4) prognostic considerations; (5) risk reduction/prevention. While ongoing research specific to SRC in circus is needed, this guideline supports and advises circus organisations to develop concussion management protocols and policies. It also informs clinicians to assist their understanding of the unique aspects and demands of circus arts to provide tailored clinical care in the rehabilitation of circus artists as they return to training and performance following SRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.