ArticleJournal of research in pharmacy practice
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Mirtazapine in the Treatment of Uremic Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial.
Article in Journal of research in pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treating depression in dialysis patients: pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Uremic pruritus (UP) is a prevalent and debilitating condition experienced by patients undergoing hemodialysis, influenced by multiple underlying mechanisms. Despite the availability of various treatment options, many patients still endure significant pruritus. This double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial aims to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of mirtazapine and hydroxyzine in treating UP and improving sleep quality in hemodialysis patients. Methods: Twenty-seven patients in the mirtazapine group received 15 mg/night (7.5 mg for the first two nights) with a hydroxyzine placebo, while 28 patients in the hydroxyzine group received 25 mg/night (12.5 mg for the first two nights) with a mirtazapine placebo for 2 weeks. UP was assessed using the 5D-itch scale, and sleep quality was measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at baseline, weeks 2, 3, and 4. Adverse effects were recorded using the Antidepressant Side Effect Checklist at each visit from baseline to week 2. Findings: UP ratings based on the 5D-itch scale decreased for both groups, with a more significant reduction in the mirtazapine group ( Conclusion: This study suggests that short-term treatment with mirtazapine is more effective than hydroxyzine in reducing the severity of UP and improving sleep quality for patients undergoing hemodialysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.