Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432835›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Cost and Challenges of Clinical Competency Committees and Milestones Assessment.

Marcos C Borges, McKenzie M Kennedy, Charles W Kropf, Matthew D Caldwell, Robert D Huang, Grace J Kim, David T Hughes, Larry D Gruppen, Deborah M Rooney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marcos C BorgesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6280-0714
McKenzie M KennedyDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4294-2774
Charles W KropfDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8380-6664
Matthew D CaldwellDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7648-7239
Robert D HuangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8928-473X
Grace J KimDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9464-7005
David T HughesDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3243-9782
Larry D GruppenDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2107-0126
Deborah M RooneyDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9335-4294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several challenges regarding Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) processes have been previously reported. Few studies have addressed the cost of assessment in healthcare professional education. This study aimed to assess the time spent on and the cost of CCC processes, and faculty perception of the Milestones assessment in three residency programs. Methods: We surveyed CCC faculty members to capture time devoted to, and satisfaction with, CCC processes from three residency programs at the University of Michigan: Anesthesiology, Emergency Medicine, and Surgery. During preparatory periods before CCC meetings, administrative staff used daily logs to record time spent in the CCC preparatory period to develop meeting documents and resident reports. CCC faculty members supplied estimated time spent preparing residents' assessments through a survey administered the day following the meeting. Additionally, the duration of each CCC meeting was recorded, and salaries were confirmed to estimate total cost. Total faculty and staff time was summed and reviewed by each departmental CCC program director. Results: CCC members found the unstandardized semi-annual report compiled by the programs was poorly organized, not easy to review, and did not provide high-quality information for setting Milestones. The majority of CCC members reported the current CCC process does not allow enough time for review of resident data, does not provide valuable feedback to inform resident progression, and does not provide adequate rigor to defend CCC decisions. Annually, administrative staff spent 162.9 ± 151.7 h preparing the reports. Faculty spent 147.0 ± 78.4 h for the resident assessment preparation and 97.3 ± 24.1 h in CCCs meeting. Based on salaries, the cost of CCC processes for Milestone assessment totaled USD83,437, with USD22,776, USD31,764, and USD28,897 for Anesthesiology, Emergency Medicine, and Surgery, respectively. With an average of USD395.44 per resident, the total annual CCC cost for University of Michigan Medical was extrapolated to be USD404,531. Conclusions: Though Milestones were implemented more than ten years ago, CCC processes are still unsatisfactory to faculty and pose a significant institutional cost. Alternative approaches are still needed to improve resident competency assessment processes.

Indexed as

clinical competencecostmedical residencymilestones

Identifiers

PMID40432835
PMCPMC12106988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.