Article in Chem & bio engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Xiaofeng LiSouth China Advanced Institute for Soft Matter Science and Technology, School of Emergent Soft Matter, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Xi ShanSouth China Advanced Institute for Soft Matter Science and Technology, School of Emergent Soft Matter, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Jiadong ChenSouth China Advanced Institute for Soft Matter Science and Technology, School of Emergent Soft Matter, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Jun ZhuSouth China Advanced Institute for Soft Matter Science and Technology, School of Emergent Soft Matter, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Yang ChenSouth China Advanced Institute for Soft Matter Science and Technology, School of Emergent Soft Matter, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Xueyi ChenMOE International Joint Research Laboratory on Synthetic Biology and Medicines, School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, 510006 Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2948-2054
Shahao LiSouth China Advanced Institute for Soft Matter Science and Technology, School of Emergent Soft Matter, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Mengze LuSouth China Advanced Institute for Soft Matter Science and Technology, School of Emergent Soft Matter, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8012-2942
Yuhui DuMOE International Joint Research Laboratory on Synthetic Biology and Medicines, School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, 510006 Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2036-5408
Panchao YinSouth China Advanced Institute for Soft Matter Science and Technology, School of Emergent Soft Matter, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2902-8376
Tingjian ChenMOE International Joint Research Laboratory on Synthetic Biology and Medicines, School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, 510006 Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4458-4269
Taolin SunSouth China Advanced Institute for Soft Matter Science and Technology, School of Emergent Soft Matter, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6006-5859
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Bio-based plastics offer the advantage of biodegradability over traditional petroleum-based plastics, enabling natural reintegration into the environment and positioning them as a more sustainable alternative. DNA, as a natural biopolymer, exhibits excellent biocompatibility and degradability. However, the mechanical strength of currently biomass DNA-based materials is inferior to that of other bio-based and petroleum-based plastics. In this work, DNA plastics with a ″brick-and-mortar" structure were fabricated using DNA extracted from onions through bidirectional freezing, water vapor annealing, and compression densification. This biomimetic design significantly enhances the fracture toughness (∼1.5 MPa·m
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Bioinspired DNA Plastics with Brick-and-Mortar Structure: Enhanced Toughness, Recyclability, and Degradability. · full record | OpenQuestion