Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432790›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2025

Neuroimaging correlates of psychological resilience: an Open Science systematic review and meta-analysis.

Allison Kuehn, Maegan L Calvert, G Andrew James

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Allison KuehnDepartment of Psychology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Maegan L CalvertDepartment of Psychology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
G Andrew JamesDepartment of Psychology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: While risk factors have been identified for numerous psychiatric disorders, many individuals exposed to these risk factors do not develop psychopathology. A growing neuroimaging literature has sought to find structural and functional brain features that confer psychological resilience against developing psychiatric disorders. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies associated with psychological resilience. Searches of Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and PsychInfo yielded 2,658 potentially relevant articles published 2000-2021. Of these, we identified 154 human neuroimaging articles which provided anatomical coordinates of regions promoting resilience against psychiatric disorders including PTSD (44% of articles), schizophrenia (18%), major depressive disorder (14%) and bipolar disorder (12%). Results: Meta-analysis conducted in GingerALE identified three regions as promoting psychological resilience across disorders (cluster-level FWE Discussion: We additionally introduce a novel framework for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses that is compliant with best practices of Open Science: our publicly viewable systematic review was curated and annotated using the open-source reference manager Zotero, with customizable Python scripts for extracting curated data for meta-analyses. Our methodological pipeline not only permits independent replication of our findings but also supports customization for future neuroimaging meta-analyses.

Indexed as

amygdalaanterior cingulatemeta-analysisneuroimagingpsychiatric disorderspsychological resilience

Identifiers

PMID40432790
PMCPMC12106531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.