ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Firearm violence and policy in the United States: A survey study on the perspectives of hand surgeons.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Firearm ownership and gun control are subjects of great contention. As healthcare professionals responsible for treating firearm-related injuries, the opinions of hand surgeons are particularly relevant. The aim of this study is to determine the association between exposure to gun violence and opinions regarding gun control or the role of the surgeon in the gun control debate and if gun ownership status correlates with these opinions. Methods: A survey comprised of 24 multiple-choice and free text questions was distributed to the email database of the ASSH. The survey identified factors related to surgeon's practices, such as practice setting, location, and training background. Questions regarding surgeons' experiences with firearms and opinions on the responsibility of surgeons to take part in policymaking were assessed. Chi square, Kendall, binary logistic, and ordinal regression analyses were conducted as appropriate. Results: A total of 578 responses were received. Approximately 17 % of respondents reported treating firearm injuries frequently (several times per month). The majority of respondents report feeling comfortable with treating such injuries.Disagreement with current gun policies was found in half of respondents. The majority of surgeons feel that they do not have a responsibility to be involved in the gun control debate. Firearm ownership was positively associated with belief in the second amendment as a basic right, acceptable recreational gun use, the belief that guns create a safer home, and the belief that adequate resources are available. Years of practice and comfort in treating firearm-related injuries were not associated with any response. Conclusions: These objective findings may better inform on the opinions of healthcare professionals directly involved in the treatment of firearm injuries. Awareness of the origins of opinions on both sides of the debate are critical to fostering productive conversations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.