ArticleBio-protocol2025
Quantifying Thrombogenicity: A Bioanalytical Protocol for the Absorbance-Based Assessment of Vascular Implants with Plasma.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessing thrombogenicity is crucial for evaluating biomaterials, especially those that interface with flowing blood, such as cardiovascular implants, including vascular stents, grafts, and stent-grafts. To standardize thrombogenicity assessments, we use human plasma and quantify the light absorbance associated with the biomaterial. For this evaluation, various tubular vascular implants from leading brands-such as bare-metal stents, drug-eluting stents, vascular grafts, and stent-grafts-are longitudinally sectioned into small pieces and placed in a low-adhesion 96-well plate. Using either platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or platelet-poor plasma (PPP), we measure the absorbance of light passing through the plate over an hour and plot the resulting curve. This method quantifies the thrombogenicity of a biomaterial under controlled conditions. Key factors examined include anticoagulants, platelet presence, and surface-coating molecules to assess their impact on thrombogenicity. Using this simple, reproducible protocol, we demonstrated (a) the relative efficacy of various anticoagulants in thrombogenicity assessments, and (b) the effectiveness of vascular coating molecules in reducing thrombogenicity on stents. This streamlined approach offers valuable insights for optimizing biomaterial performance in vascular implants. Unlike conventional clotting assays, which focus on standardized blood clotting mechanisms, this assay is tailored to evaluate biomaterials and external parameters influencing thrombogenicity. Key features • This protocol is a static, in vitro, quantitative assessment of thrombogenicity for both novel and commercial vascular biomaterials with flat or tubular geometries. • Thrombogenicity is assessed by evaluating the opaqueness of platelet-rich or platelet-poor plasma over time to measure fibrin formation. • Various anticoagulants such as sodium citrate, sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and sodium heparin are compared to evaluate the efficacy of the protocol. • This protocol compares the thrombogenicity of various commercial stents, grafts, and stent-graft hybrids, as well as novel molecular coatings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.