ArticleBio-protocol2025
Electrophysiological Evaluation of a Sciatic Nerve Degree III Injury Model in Rats.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Macrophage Dab1 Links Early Hypoxia to Adaptive Angiogenesis to Drive Peripheral Nerve Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Phase-Specific Evaluation of Sciatic Nerve Regeneration in Preclinical Studies: A Review of Functional Assessment, Emerging Therapies, and Translational Value.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sciatic nerve injury is a prevalent traumatic condition that significantly impacts a patient's quality of life. The sciatic nerve compression injury model is among the most commonly utilized models for investigating nerve repair and regeneration. Within this context, the degree III sciatic nerve injury model is frequently employed in scientific research due to its clinical relevance and its suitability for studies focused on functional recovery. However, a standardized approach for accurately assessing the success of constructing the degree III sciatic nerve injury model remains lacking. Traditional macroscopic observation methods exhibit limitations, whereas neurophysiological testing serves as a highly sensitive and objective evaluation technique that can directly reflect changes in nerve conduction function, thus providing reliable quantitative evidence for the successful establishment of the model. This study aims to offer a comprehensive description of the application of neurophysiological techniques in evaluating the construction of the degree III sciatic nerve injury model, thereby ensuring the success of model preparation. Key features • Precisely simulate a degree III sciatic nerve injury. • Conduct neurophysiological tests on the sciatic nerve 30 min after the injury. • Use neurophysiological techniques to improve the accuracy and repeatability of scientific study results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.