Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432710›Full record

ArticleCase reports in medicine2025

Nonsurgical Management of Furcation Defects Using Cervical Sealing With Calcium-Silicate Cements: A Clinical Case Series.

Saeed Asgary

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saeed AsgaryIranian Center for Endodontic Research, Research Institute for Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6691-0478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Furcation defects pose significant challenges in endodontic and periodontal therapy due to their complex anatomy and limited accessibility. Achieving a reliable seal at the apical/cervical/coronal levels is critical for long-term treatment success. This case series investigates the use of calcium-silicate biomaterials, specifically calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement, as cervical sealants in the nonsurgical management of furcation defects with endodontic origin, evaluating their regenerative potential and clinical applicability. Six endodontically treated teeth with furcation defects were included. All cases had undergone orthograde root canal therapy in the past and then were nonsurgically retreated with CEM cement placed as a cervical seal for this report. Baseline and follow-up evaluations, conducted over an average period of 31 months, assessed the clinical parameters of probing depths, furcation involvement, and radiographic evidence of healing. Radiographically, five cases demonstrated complete healing/regeneration, and one case showed partial resolution of the furcal lesion. Improvements in periodontal parameters, including lesser probing depths and elimination of bleeding and discharge, were observed across all cases, resulting in restored functionality of the affected teeth. The results suggest that CEM cement was an effective cervical sealing biomaterial for the nonsurgical management of furcation defects with endodontic origin. These findings highlight the potential of bioactive endodontic materials in minimally invasive dental therapies. Further studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-ups are needed to validate these findings.

Indexed as

calcium derivativeCEMcervical sealendodonticsfurcation defectsmineral trioxide aggregateminimally invasive

Identifiers

PMID40432710
PMCPMC12116208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.