Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432688›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2024

Neonatal Birth Fractures.

Tyler C McDonald, C Lake Higdon, William A Cutchen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tyler C McDonaldDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
C Lake HigdonCollege of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
William A CutchenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fractures in newborn infants due to trauma imparted by the birthing process are rare. These skeletal injuries can occur in the form of diaphyseal fractures or, much less commonly, separation of physes. Often, prompt recognition of birth fractures is difficult, which may lead to late presentation. Careful and thorough physical examination can identify the presence of these injuries, leading to appropriate treatment. Diaphyseal fractures can be treated non-operatively with light immobilization and comfort measures, with an excellent prognosis. Physeal injuries more often require surgical treatment to stabilize the displaced epiphyseal fragment after restoring anatomy. This review is designed for the orthopaedic clinician as an overview of the most commonly encountered varieties of these rare birth fractures so that they may be better equipped to recognize, diagnose, and offer appropriate treatment. Key Concepts: (1)Fractures and physeal separations sustained from birth trauma are rare and often require a high index of suspicion for diagnosis.(2)The overwhelming majority of diaphyseal fractures sustained from birth trauma can be treated nonoperatively with an excellent prognosis.(3)Physeal separations can be easily confused with other diagnoses, such as joint dislocations, and more often require surgical intervention for stabilization.

Indexed as

Birth fractureBirth trauma

Identifiers

PMID40432688
PMCPMC12088161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.