ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2024
To Manipulate or Not? Management of Pediatric Knee Arthrofibrosis Following Operative Fixation of Tibial Spine Fractures.
Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increased operative time is an independent risk factor for surgical complications following isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Commentary to Quality Improvement Case Series: Iatrogenic Physeal Fracture Sustained During Manipulation for Arthrofibrosis of the Knee.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025Article
- Iatrogenic Physeal Fracture Sustained During Manipulation for Arthrofibrosis of the Knee.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025Article
- Arthroscopic screw versus suture fixation in tibial eminence fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery & related research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Knee arthrofibrosis is a common complication after surgical fixation of tibial spine fractures. However, there is no standardized treatment modality for resultant arthrofibrosis, with some surgeons electing for nonoperative management, while others prefer manipulation under anesthesia with a possible arthroscopic lysis of adhesions, if indicated. To better understand indications and outcomes from these treatment modalities for arthrofibrosis, we examined patients treated by both approaches. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective case series of patients with arthrofibrosis after tibial spine fracture surgery. Arthrofibrosis was defined as loss of knee extension ≥10.0° and/or knee flexion ≥25.0° compared to the contralateral, uninjured knee at three months following index surgery. Patients were organized into 2 cohorts: nonoperative and operative treatment. Data were collected for demographics, fracture classification, concomitant injuries, treatment timeline, and knee range of motion. Results: There were 16 patients in the operative group and 10 patients in the nonoperative group. At the time of diagnosis, the operative group had a mean 10° larger flexion deficit compared to the nonoperative group. Both treatment modalities resulted in similar ranges of motion at terminal evaluation. Final flexion was recorded as 130° in the operative group and 127° in the nonoperative group. Final extension deficits were 3° in both cohorts. Conclusions: Operative and nonoperative treatment modalities can be effective in management of knee arthrofibrosis after fixation of tibial spine fractures. Nonoperative treatment may be more suitable for milder range of motion deficits, but further research is necessary to guide clinical practice. Key Concepts: (1)Cohorts were similar in demographics, fracture classification, and concomitant injuries.(2)Patients who received a second operation presented with a greater flexion deficit.(3)The mean time between initial surgery and reoperation was 85 days.(4)Operative and nonoperative treatment of arthrofibrosis resulted in similar outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Case Series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.