ReviewJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2024
Prenatal Counseling for Congenital Clubfoot.
Review in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prenatal Diagnosis of PITX1-Related Limb Malformations in the Second Trimester.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- Prenatal diagnosis of congenital talipes equinovarus: favorable outcome is highly dependent on the absence of associated anomalies.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital clubfoot is a common deformity that affects 1 in 1000 newborns and is frequently detected prenatally during routine prenatal care. A wide variety of detection methods and testing are used to identify clubfoot and other congenital anomalies in the fetus, including complete ultrasonography, amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling, or cell-free DNA. Newer studies have associated certain genome sequences to clubfoot specifically. It is important for orthopaedic surgeons to understand the implications of the various tests to provide the appropriate prenatal counseling. Early prenatal detection of clubfoot can help parents prepare for the demands of caring for a child with clubfoot and build trust between families and clinicians, ultimately leading to better, patient-centered care for their children. Key Concepts: (1)Prompt recognition and treatment of congenital clubfoot is imperative to facilitate optimal treatment.(2)Prenatal diagnosis usually consists of sonography of the plantar surface of both feet at 13-16 weeks' gestation.(3)Additional post-natal testing may be indicated in patients with neurological impairment or syndromic features.(4)Genetic markers such as PITX1, RBM10, HOX, and CASP (among others) have been identified as involved in clubfoot development and have implications on prenatal testing and counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.