ArticleCureus2025
Ex Vivo Microsuturing of the Human Anterior Lens Capsule Using 10-0 Sutures: A Technical Feasibility Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human lens capsule is a robust, transparent basement membrane commonly discarded during cataract surgery. Although its use as a biological graft has gained interest in ocular surgery, practical methods for securing the capsule, such as suturing, have not been evaluated. This technical report presents the first in vitro assessment of anterior lens capsule sutureability using fine 10-0 sutures. Anterior capsule specimens were obtained from two patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome undergoing routine cataract surgery. After being stored for four hours in balanced salt solution (BSS), the specimens, one stained with trypan blue and the other unstained, were spread on a plastic surface (a cellophane sheet: as a non-biologic backing substrate) and sutured using 10-0 nylon (Ethilon™, Ethicon, Raritan, NJ, USA) and 10-0 polyglactin 910 (Vicryl™, Ethicon, Raritan, NJ, USA) under an operating microscope. Both suture types could be successfully passed through the capsule without immediate tearing. The stained capsule enhanced visibility but appeared slightly more fragile, while the unstained capsule demonstrated greater elasticity. Attempts to reapproximate full-thickness capsule tears using sutures were unsuccessful. Viscoelastic agents, including MiniVisc® Plus (Bausch + Lomb, Vaughan, Canada) and DisCoVisc® (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA), did not aid in capsule stabilization and reduced visibility during manipulation. No specialized instruments beyond standard ophthalmic tools were used. These findings demonstrate that human anterior lens capsules can tolerate fine suturing in vitro and suggest their potential as suturable biological grafts in applications such as corneal patching, pterygium surgery, or ocular surface reconstruction. However, limitations in tear repair and in vivo behavior require further investigation to establish clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.