ArticleCureus2025
Stent-Assisted Coiling in a Nickel-Allergic Patient.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endovascular Management of Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms in Patients with Nickel Allergy: Three Cases.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the case of a woman in her fourth decade of life with a known nickel allergy. She visited the previous clinic complaining of a headache. Head MRI was performed, which showed a right internal carotid artery aneurysm, and she was referred to our hospital for further treatment. We planned treatment using coiling embolization with a balloon catheter because we were afraid of allergic reactions against the nickel device. However, recused stenting was done during the procedure to prevent coil migration. After the treatment, there were no post-procedure neurological complications or hypersensitivity reactions due to nickel allergy. No medication was given to suppress the hypersensitivity reaction. The patient was discharged from the hospital with no complications. This case demonstrates that nickel-containing stents can be safely used in selected patients with confirmed nickel allergy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.