ArticleImmunity, inflammation and disease2025
RETRACTION: NEAT1 Enhances MPP + -Induced Pyroptosis in a Cell Model of Parkinson's Disease via Targeting miR-5047/YAF2 Signaling.
Article in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionH. Shen, H. Song, S. Wang, D. Su and Q. Sun, "NEAT1 Enhances MPP + -Induced Pyroptosis in a Cell Model of Parkinson's Disease via Targeting miR-5047/YAF2 Signaling," Immunity, Inflammation and Disease 11, no. 6 (2023): e817, https://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.817. The above article, published online on 23 June 2023 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Marc Veldhoen; and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The retraction has been agreed upon due to the ASC western blot bands in Figure 1 C being found duplicated in a previously published article, representing a different scientific context. The authors were contacted for comment and supporting data but did not respond. The editors consider the results and conclusions of this article unreliable. The authors were informed of the retraction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.