Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432493›Full record

GuidelineRespirology (Carlton, Vic.)2025

Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) Guidance for the Management of Electronic Cigarette Use (Vaping) in Adolescents and Adults.

Henry Marshall, Moya Vandeleur, Emma Dean, Chris Barton, Nia Luxton, Kristin Carson-Chahhoud, Andre Schultz, Janet Williams, Tahlia Grammatopoulos, Emily Stone and 4 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Guideline in Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Mapping Access to Nicotine Vaping Products for Smoking Cessation: Pharmacist Needs and Practice Implications in South-East Melbourne.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Henry MarshallDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-8014
Moya VandeleurDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Emma DeanQuit, Cancer Council Victoria, East Melbourne, Australia.
Chris BartonDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Nia LuxtonDiscipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia.
Kristin Carson-ChahhoudHoud Research Group, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Andre SchultzWal-yan Respiratory Research Centre, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2000-8910
Janet WilliamsLung Health Promotion Centre, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Tahlia GrammatopoulosFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Emily StoneDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9021-8449
Smita ShahFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Stuart JonesRespiratory Medicine, Te Whatu Ora Counties Manukau DHB, Auckland, New Zealand.
Christine F McDonaldDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6481-3391
Matthew PetersDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic cigarette (EC) use, especially among younger members of society, has grown to concerning levels in many countries, including Australia and New Zealand. Uptake in the general population, driven by technological and pharmacological innovations, and accelerated by aggressive tobacco/vaping industry marketing, has outpaced medical research. As the harms of EC use become increasingly evident, the Australian Government has introduced policies to curb recreational EC use, whilst still allowing access for smoking cessation. This highly dynamic environment presents new challenges to clinicians as the evidence to support clinical practice with respect to vaping use and its cessation remains very limited. This guidance document from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand aims to address this unmet need by offering practical advice for clinicians to help protect their patients' lung and general health by: preventing EC uptake in children, adolescents, and young adults; providing guidance for ceasing EC use in adolescents and adults who have never smoked; and providing guidance for ceasing EC use in people who currently or formerly smoked who now use EC long-term. Underpinned by a systematic review, this multidisciplinary expert consensus document summarises the current landscape of EC use, nicotine addiction, behavioural and pharmacotherapy treatments. Illustrative case vignettes are provided. The advice, largely extrapolated from the smoking cessation literature, is based on the consensus of the authors in the absence of high-quality randomised trials for vaping cessation and is applicable to all age groups. We emphasise the urgent unmet need for vaping-specific cessation research to inform future practice.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationVapingAdolescentAdultAustraliaHumansNew ZealandSocieties, MedicalTobacco Use DisorderYoung Adultadolescent healthclinical respiratory medicineelectronic cigarettesnicotinepaediatric lung diseasepaediatricstobaccovaping

Identifiers

PMID40432493
PMCPMC12231769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.