ArticleRevista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia2025
[Impact of a dedicated multidisciplinary committee (
Article in Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Management of Infective Endocarditis: A Narrative Review Focused on Unmet Clinical Needs and the Multidisciplinary Approach.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInfective endocarditis (IE) is a complex condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. The creation of multidisciplinary teams (endocarditis team) has been shown to improve its management and prognosis. We analysed the impact of the formal implementation of a multidisciplinary IE committee (coIE) in a tertiary care hospital.
methodsSingle-centre quasi-experimental study comparing two periods: before (2010-2015) and after (2017-2021) the implementation of the coIE. The coIE met weekly (and on demand when necessary) to make decisions regarding medical and surgical management in patients with definite or possible IE, following a protocol based on international guidelines.
resultsWe included 92 and 97 patients in the pre- and post-intervention periods, respectively. Demographic characteristics, predisposing factors, and types of IE were similar. No significant differences were observed in the proportion of patients with surgical indication who underwent surgery (30.2 % vs 39.1 %, respectively; p = 0.317), in-hospital mortality (27.2 % vs 34.0 %; p = 0.308), or one-year mortality (32.6 % vs 45.4 %; p = 0.073). The median (interquartile range) time from diagnosis to surgery decreased in the post-intervention period (11.5 [6.3-25.3] vs 7 [3-10] days; p = 0.026). The diagnosis of embolic events was more frequent in this period (46.7 % vs 58.8 %; p = 0.098).
conclusionsAlthough we did not observe a significant impact on mortality among patients with definite IE after the implementation of an endocarditis team, we noted a favourable trend in intermediate indicators of healthcare quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.