Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432363›Full record

ArticleAnnals of dermatology2025

Comparative Efficacy of Ustekinumab and Guselkumab in Improving Itch in Severe Psoriasis Patients.

Ji Hoon Ryoo, Nam Gyoung Ha, Han Jin Jung, Dae-Lyong Ha, Jun Young Kim, Weon Ju Lee, Yong Hyun Jang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. IL-23 Inhibitors in Psoriasis: What Have We Learnt so Far?Journal of inflammation research · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ji Hoon Ryoo *Department of Education, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7546-6911
Nam Gyoung Ha *Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5777-6705
Han Jin JungDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Dae-Lyong HaDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2268-4795
Jun Young KimDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2999-1018
Weon Ju LeeDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5708-1305
Yong Hyun JangDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. yhjang@knu.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1706-007X

Funding

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy 20023929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiologics effectively improve psoriatic skin lesions, but their impact on itch relief remains unclear.

objectiveTo evaluate itch improvement in severe psoriasis patients treated with ustekinumab or guselkumab.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed patients with severe psoriasis who completed initial efficacy evaluations after treatment with either biologic. Itch severity was assessed using numerical rating scale (NRS), visual analog scale, and verbal rating scale. NRS improvement was evaluated after three injections.

resultsAmong 108 patients (74 on ustekinumab, 34 on guselkumab), 77 (71.3%) had moderate-to-severe itch (NRS ≥4) at baseline. Of these, 63 (81.8%) achieved an NRS improvement of ≥4 points. Ustekinumab showed greater itch relief compared to guselkumab in NRS (

conclusionWhile guselkumab is generally preferred for psoriatic skin lesions, ustekinumab may provide superior itch relief.

Indexed as

GuselkumabPruritusPsoriasisUstekinumab

Identifiers

PMID40432363
PMCPMC12117548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.