Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432327›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology2025

Chikungunya and Dengue Encephalitis: A Critical Narrative Review.

Rajesh Verma, Rajarshi Chakraborty, Ankit Khetan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rajesh VermaDepartment of Neurology, King George's Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rajarshi Chakraborty
Ankit Khetan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractViral encephalitis is one of the leading presenting features of neurologic emergencies in tropical and subtropical areas. Chikungunya encephalitis (CE) and dengue encephalitis (DE) are important neurologic disorders of the central nervous system (CNS) with increased morbidity and mortality. This review discusses the pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnostic workup, and management of CE and DE, and provides insights into the vector-borne diseases with the help of literature obtained from clinical studies, reviews, and case series/reports. Chikungunya, as well as dengue viruses, are spread by the bite of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus . The pathogenesis includes either direct invasion of the nervous system and/or immune-mediated CNS injury. It starts with fever, body aches/myalgia, and arthralgia (more in chikungunya) and may progress to encephalitis, if not treated properly during the initial stages. Laboratory investigations show leukopenia/thrombocytopenia, immunoglobulin M (serum and cerebrospinal fluid) positivity, and real-time polymerase chain reaction positivity. Brain imaging does not have any specific diagnostic clue. However, chikungunya has a predilection for the medulla oblongata, while dengue may affect the thalamus to show the classical double doughnut sign. Treatment is invariably medical, with adequate hydration and additional supportive care, although steroids and immunoglobulins have also been tried. CE and DE are critical vector-borne illnesses of CNS with guarded prognosis. The exact pathogenesis needs further research insights. A high index of clinical suspicion and aggressive management can lead to better outcomes. No specific therapy or immunization is available for CE or DE. However, these can be controlled by cleaning and eliminating all potential vector-breeding places.

Indexed as

chikungunyadengueEncephalitisimagingoutcome

Identifiers

PMID40432327
PMCPMC12192396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.