Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432257›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthodontics2025

Effect of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances on the development of gingival recession. A prospective controlled study.

Dimitrios Kloukos, George Koukos, Nikolaos Pandis, Ioannis Doulis, Andreas Stavropoulos, Christos Katsaros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Turkish journal of orthodontics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dimitrios KloukosDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0665-238X
George KoukosDepartment of Periodontology, 251 Hellenic Air Force Hospital, Panagioti Kanellopoulou 3, 11525, Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos PandisDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Ioannis DoulisDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 251 Hellenic Air Force Hospital, Panagioti Kanellopoulou 3, 11525, Athens, Greece.
Andreas StavropoulosPeriodontology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Carl Gustafs väg 34, 21421, Malmö, Sweden.
Christos KatsarosDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

Papavramidès Foundation, Bern, Switzerland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess in a prospective controlled study whether orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances results in development of gingival recession (GR), compared with an untreated group of participants. MATERIALS &

methodsThe sample consisted of 40 consecutive adult orthodontic patients (Intervention group) and 40 untreated adult volunteers, that satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were selected from the same background population, as the control group. GR was measured as part of a full periodontal assessment: before treatment (T0) and 12 months after removal of the fixed appliances (T1) in the intervention group, i.e. at about 30 months from T0, and at baseline (T0) and 30 months after (T1) in the control group. A count data model was fit using the sum of recessions at T1 and as predictors: treatment, periodontal phenotype (thin/thick), side (buccal/lingual), sex, age, and number of recessions at baseline, with robust standard errors to account for the multiple within patient observations.

resultsNineteen females and 21 males in each group [mean age in years (range): intervention group 23.1 (16.8 - 43.3); control: 21.85 (18.2 - 43.9)] were analyzed. During the whole study period, the control group exhibited a modest increase in the number of recessions over time. Several patients in the intervention group exhibited a larger increase in the number of recessions than the controls. However, this was partly counteracted by a considerable amount of reduction in the number of recessions in several patients receiving treatment. The adjusted incidence for recession was 67% higher for the intervention group versus the control group (IRR = 1.67, 95% CIs: 1.05, 2.67, P = 0.03). Most recessions, though, were up to 1mm. The most affected teeth were the canines and the first premolars.

conclusionsCompared to untreated individuals, patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances showed a higher incidence rate of gingival recession at 1-year posttreatment, adjusted for age, periodontal phenotype, side, gender and number of recessions at baseline. However, the severity of gingival recessions was of limited extent.

Indexed as

Gingival RecessionOrthodontic Appliances, FixedAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalePeriodontal IndexProspective StudiesYoung Adultcontrolledfixed appliancesgingival recessionorthodontic treatment

Identifiers

PMID40432257
PMCPMC12116418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.