Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432236›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2025

Uncovering the reciprocal effects of plant polyploidy and the microbiome: implications for understanding of polyploid success.

Tia-Lynn Ashman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Polyploidy: A macromutational force pushing bioeconomic developments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tia-Lynn AshmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9884-5954

Funding

Division of Environmental Biology 2027604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyploidy plays a major role in diversification and speciation of almost all plants. Separately, the microbiome is recognized for its ubiquitous role in plant functioning. Despite the importance of both processes, we lack a synthetic picture of their reciprocal relationship. I forge this missing linkage by presenting the ways in which plant polyploidy can shape the microbiome and how the microbiome in turn can affect polyploid phenotype and fitness. I illustrate these interactions by drawing on the small, but compelling, set of comparisons of the plant-microbial community interaction with taxa representing different stages of the polyploid continuum and thereby shed light on how the advantages of polyploidy may be influenced by microbes. I use findings from a range of studies to build the case for plant-microbiome reciprocal interactions in both key pathways for polyploid persistence: overcoming their minority cytotype disadvantage and increasing competitive ability and/or niche shifts relative to diploids. I put forward how the microbiome likely plays a role in polyploid stress tolerance, abiotic niche breadth, range limits and coexistence. I conclude by identifying the research needed to test these hypotheses and how doing so could transform our understanding of polyploidy as a driver of plant ecology and evolution.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPlantsPolyploidycoexistencemicrobiomeminority cytotypeniche breadthplant–microbe interactionplasticitypolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID40432236
PMCPMC12222933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.