Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432151›Full record

ReviewVaccines2025

Malaria Vaccines: Current Achievements and Path Forward.

Jiayan Chen, Qi Wang, Xiaomeng He, Bei Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Atomic clarity: how structural biology is shaping blood-stage malaria vaccines.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiayan ChenShanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies and School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Qi WangShanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies and School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Xiaomeng HeShanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies and School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Bei YangShanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies and School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32371272 and 32070170Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission 23ZR1442500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria remains a significant global health challenge. Although the recent approval of the liver-stage vaccines RTS, S and R21 marks significant progress in malaria control, challenges remain in achieving long-lasting and broad protection. In this review, we provide an overview of the current landscape of malaria control, especially anti-malaria vaccine development. We first review the development of the RTS, S and R21 vaccines, highlighting their efficacy and limitations. We then examine other vaccines in development, including attenuated whole-sporozoite vaccines, as well as blood-stage-targeting vaccines and transmission-blocking vaccines targeting a variety of different immunogens. Additionally, we discuss emerging technologies, such as mRNA-based platforms, nanoparticle delivery systems, and novel adjuvants, assessing their potential to enhance the efficacy and mitigate the waning immunity concerns of most malaria vaccines. We believe that the identification of novel immunogen candidates, together with continued innovation in vaccine design and delivery, will enable us to win the fight against malaria in the future.

Indexed as

adjuvantsclinical trialsmalaria vaccinesmRNA vaccinesnanoparticlePlasmodiumpreclinical

Identifiers

PMID40432151
PMCPMC12115420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.