Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432128›Full record

ArticleVaccines2025

Allocation of Oral Cholera Vaccines in Africa.

Elisa M Maffioli, Yutong Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elisa M MaffioliDepartment of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3303-7945
Yutong LuDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-8723-5599

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this study, we examine the allocation of oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) across 25 African countries between 2013 and 2019.

methodsWe constructed a dataset combining cholera outbreaks and requests, decisions, and deliveries of OCVs from the Global Task Force on Cholera Control, alongside additional covariates. Using machine learning algorithms, we assess the relative importance of socio-demographic, governance, and weather variables in predicting cholera outbreaks. We constructed and used an "index of cholera risk" as an instrumental variable to predict the likelihood of suspected cases and estimate the impact of cholera outbreaks on OCV allocation.

resultsThe majority of OCVs (77.4%) were allocated reactively. Governments took an average of 299.6 days to request doses, international agencies took 10.4 days to decide, and it took 84 days for vaccines to be delivered. Countries experiencing a cholera outbreak were 31.7 and 36.5 percentage points more likely to request and receive a vaccine delivery in the same month as the outbreak, respectively. We confirmed that the probability of obtaining vaccines through a reactive mechanism was 48.4 percentage points higher compared to preventive allocation. When exploring the heterogeneity of impacts, OCVs were more likely to be requested, allocated, and delivered in countries with strong institutions and those not facing crisis situations. OCVs were also more likely to be allocated in the central parts of the continent.

conclusionsWhile OCV allocation is responsive to cholera outbreaks, addressing delays, particularly in high-risk countries, could improve their distribution and mitigate the impact of cholera outbreaks. This study highlights the need for targeted strategies to ensure vaccine access in fragile and conflict-affected settings, where institutional capacity is weaker.

Indexed as

choleradisease outbreakresource allocationvaccines

Identifiers

PMID40432128
PMCPMC12115386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.