Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432097›Full record

ReviewVaccines2025

Health Equity and Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Interventions for Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

Sarah B Maness, Lois Coleman Carpenter, Idara Akpan, Nubwa St James, Daniela Romero-Cely, G J Corey Harmon, Miranda Cano, Erika L Thompson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah B ManessDepartment of Health Education and Promotion, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0757-7972
Lois Coleman CarpenterDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9930-4669
Idara AkpanPopulation & Community Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76104, USA.
Nubwa St JamesDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Daniela Romero-CelyBrody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.
G J Corey HarmonLaupus Health Sciences Library, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3620-4414
Miranda CanoDepartment of Quantitative and Qualitative Health Sciences, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Erika L ThompsonDepartment of Quantitative and Qualitative Health Sciences, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7115-0001

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesHuman papillomavirus (HPV) causes multiple types of cancer, and demographic-based inequities in HPV-related cancers persist. Behavioral interventions have increased HPV vaccination uptake, yet it is unclear how intervention effects vary by demographics. The purpose of this study was to examine whether existing HPV vaccine interventions for adolescents have unequal effects on HPV vaccine uptake.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE via PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL in October 2023. The search strategy combined keywords and subject terms for HPV vaccine, interventions/health promotion, and adolescents. Studies were included in final analyses if they were peer-reviewed, published in the US between 2006 and 2023, included outcome measures from an evidence-based HPV vaccination intervention, included adolescents aged 9-17, and demographic variables for age, race/ethnicity, income/SES, or geographic region. Studies were excluded if they were review articles, abstract-only, dissertations or theses, non-English language, non-US-based, or outside the age range of 9-17. Studies were also excluded if they did not include an intervention, outcome evaluation measures, or demographic measures. The screening and extraction processes were independently performed by multiple reviewers using Covidence software.

resultsUltimately, 74 articles were included for full extraction. Sex was the most common demographic variable analyzed by the HPV vaccine (n = 38), followed by race/ethnicity (n = 15), income/SES (n = 6), and geographic region (n = 6).

conclusionsFew interventions assess whether intervention results differ by demographics, making it unclear whether these interventions reduce health inequities. This review included a wide variation in study designs, limiting our ability to uniformly assess study conclusions.

Indexed as

health equityhuman papillomavirussystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40432097
PMCPMC12115800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.