Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432095›Full record

ReviewVaccines2025

Dengue Vaccine Development and Deployment into Routine Immunization.

Annelies Wilder-Smith, Thomas Cherian, Joachim Hombach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Dengue vaccine: a hidden risk to Aedes aegypti control in Brazil.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annelies Wilder-SmithWorld Health Organization, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Thomas CherianWorld Health Organization, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2066-4651
Joachim HombachWorld Health Organization, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3271-6033

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue has emerged as a significant global health threat. Despite decades of research, only two dengue vaccines-CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia) and TAK-003 (Qdenga)-have been licensed to date, with limited implementation. This paper explores and outlines strategies for integrating dengue vaccines into routine immunization programs, particularly in high-burden regions. TAK-003, a tetravalent live-attenuated vaccine, has demonstrated 61% efficacy against virologically confirmed dengue and 84% efficacy against hospitalizations in endemic settings. However, concerns remain about vaccine-enhanced disease, particularly among seronegative individuals exposed to DENV3 and DENV4. WHO recommends targeted introduction in high-transmission settings without pre-vaccination screening, while ongoing post-introduction studies will further clarify long-term safety and efficacy. Effective vaccine rollout requires a multi-pronged approach, including school-based immunization, integration with adolescent health services, and strong community engagement. Decision-making for vaccine introduction should be guided by National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs), local epidemiological data, and cost-effectiveness assessments. While future vaccines, including mRNA and virus-like particle candidates, are under development, optimizing the use of currently available vaccines is crucial to reducing dengue's public health impact. Given the continued rise in cases, immediate action-combining vaccination with vector control-is essential to prevent further morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

antibody-dependent enhancementCYD-TDVdenguemRNA vaccinesQdengaschool-based programsTAK-003Wolbachia

Identifiers

PMID40432095
PMCPMC12115503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.