Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432072›Full record

ReviewVaccines2025

Papillomavirus Vaccination Programs and Knowledge Gaps as Barriers to Implementation: A Systematic Review.

Giovanni Cangelosi, Francesco Sacchini, Stefano Mancin, Fabio Petrelli, Antonella Amendola, Clara Fappani, Marco Sguanci, Sara Morales Palomares, Francesco Gravante, Gabriele Caggianelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mind the Gap: Sex-Specific Drivers of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Uptake in Serbian University Students.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giovanni CangelosiExperimental Medicine and Public Health Unit, School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8523-6906
Francesco SacchiniDepartment of Nursing, Polytechnic University of Ancona, 60121 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-2768-2571
Stefano MancinIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4988-4391
Fabio PetrelliExperimental Medicine and Public Health Unit, School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.
Antonella AmendolaDepartment of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20146 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0499-8977
Clara FappaniDepartment of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20146 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1573-5531
Marco SguanciA.O. Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8845-5127
Sara Morales PalomaresDepartment of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences (DFSSN), University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-3884-4823
Francesco GravanteLocal Health Authority of Caserta, San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, 81031 Aversa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3548-6018
Gabriele CaggianelliAzienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata, 00184 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1985-3068

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesHuman papillomavirus (HPV) is a leading cause of cervical cancer. Despite the proven effectiveness of vaccination programs, global coverage remains uneven, with significant disparities across regions due to various socioeconomic, cultural, and political factors. This study explores the primary barriers to HPV vaccination worldwide and proposes recommendations to improve access to screening and vaccination programs.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted, analyzing studies published in the past ten years from databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, following the PRISMA methodology. Study selection involved multiple researchers, with discrepancies resolved through consultation. The quality of the included studies was assessed using CASP checklists. The protocol was registered on Open Science Framework (OSF).

resultsOut of 2119 records, eight studies were included. The findings indicate that the main barriers to HPV vaccination include insufficient public awareness, cultural and religious resistance, financial constraints, and limited access in rural and underserved areas. Additionally, political factors, such as low prioritization of HPV vaccination and the absence of supportive policies, were identified as significant obstacles. Multidisciplinary and cross-cultural collaboration, along with the integration of HPV vaccination into existing health programs, was suggested as a strategic approach to improve vaccine uptake.

conclusionsBarriers to HPV vaccination, including limited awareness, inadequate healthcare infrastructure, and socioeconomic factors, vary across regions but must be addressed to improve global coverage. Targeted interventions such as health education, inclusive policies, and culturally sensitive campaigns can significantly boost vaccine uptake. Strengthening local health systems and fostering international collaboration are key strategies to overcoming these barriers and ensuring equitable access to HPV vaccination.

Indexed as

barriershealth preventionhuman papillomavirus vaccination programpublic healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40432072
PMCPMC12116001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.