Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432031›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Analytical Framework for Online Calibration of Sensor Systematic Errors Under the Generic Multisensor Integration Strategy.

Benjamin Brunson, Jianguo Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin BrunsonDepartment of Earth and Space Science and Engineering, Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3366-0887
Jianguo WangDepartment of Earth and Space Science and Engineering, Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4935-9116

Funding

NSERC 535665NSERC RGPIN-05717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes an analytical framework for pre-analyzing the potential performance of online sensor calibration in Kalman filtering. Taking a multi-sensor integrated kinematic positioning and navigation system as an example, a pre-analysis of the system performance can be conducted: the observability of individual sensor systematic error states; minimum estimable values of sensor systematic error states; and minimum detectable systematic errors in sensor observations. These measures together allow for a rigorous characterization of the potential performance of a system as part of mission planning. The proposed framework enables a thorough evaluation of the relative value of different calibration maneuvers and sensor configurations before data collection by simulating the anticipated trajectory, without even requiring the construction of a physical system. When used with the Generic Multisensor Integration Strategy (GMIS), the proposed framework provides unique insight into the potential performance of IMU sensors. To illustrate the utility of the proposed framework, two situations were analyzed: one where no specific calibration maneuvers were undertaken and one where a circular motion maneuver was undertaken. The results show the potential and practicality of the proposed framework in firmly establishing best practices for field procedures and learning about the system's capability when using online sensor calibration.

Indexed as

error analysis in discrete kalman filteringgeneric multisensor integration strategyintegrated kinematic positioning and navigationonline sensor calibrationpre-analysis

Identifiers

PMID40432031
PMCPMC12116184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.