ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Preliminary Development of a Database for Detecting Active Mounting Behaviors Using Signals Acquired from IoT Collars in Free-Grazing Cattle.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents the development of a database for detecting active mounts, utilizing IoT collars equipped with Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) installed on eight Holstein Friesian cows, along with video recordings from a long-range PTZ camera mounted in a central pole for event labeling in the natural environment when free grazing. The resulting database comprises 415 labeled events associated with various behaviors, containing acceleration signals in both the Body and World Frame of reference and gyroscope signals. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm is implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of the dataset in detecting active mounts and to compare training performance using both frames. The algorithm achieves an average F1 Score of 88.6% for the World Frame of reference, showing a significant improvement compared to the algorithm trained with Body Frame (78.6%) when both are trained with the same 112 features. After applying feature selection using Sequential Backward Selection (SBS), the SVM exhibits a minor performance difference between the F1 Score obtained with the two reference frames (89.7% World Frame vs. 91.5% Body Frame). This study provides a public dataset and a replicable methodology, facilitating future research on movement-based behavior classification in cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.