ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Assessing Physiological Stress Responses in Student Nurses Using Mixed Reality Training.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining the Use of Consumer Wearable Devices and Digital Tools for Stress Measurement in College Students: Scoping Review of Methods.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in infection prevention and control education: toward intelligent, real-time clinical learning systems.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores nursing students' stress responses while they are being trained in a mixed reality (MR) setting that replicates highly stressful clinical scenarios. Using measurements of physiological indices such as heart rate, electrodermal activity, and skin temperature, the study assesses the level of stress when the students interact with digital patients whose vital signs and symptoms interact dynamically to respond to student inputs. The simulation consists of six segments, during which critical events like hypotension and hypoxia occur, and the patient's condition changes based on the nurse's clinical decisions. Machine learning algorithms were then used to analyze the nurse's physiological data and to classify different levels of stress. Among the models tested, the Stacking Classifier demonstrated the highest classification accuracy of 96.4%, outperforming both Random Forest (96.18%) and Gradient Boosting (95.35%). The results showed clear patterns of stress during the simulation segments. Statistical analysis also found significant differences in stress responses and identified key physiological markers linked to each stress level. This pioneering study demonstrates the effectiveness of MR as a training tool for healthcare professionals in high-pressured scenarios and lays the groundwork for further studies on stress management, adaptive training procedures, and real-time detection and intervention in MR-based nursing training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.