SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Systematic Review of AI-Based Techniques for Automated Waste Classification.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Embedded Oriented Object Detection on MaixCAM Pro for Waste-Sorting Perception.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CoFUSE-EPWNet: Cross-Modal Consistency Fusion for RGB-D Express Packaging Waste Detection in Green Campus Management.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep residual and hybrid CNN models for confidence-aware real-world waste classification for sustainable waste management.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Lightweight YOLO object detectors for PET and HDPE classification in recycling facilities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Waste classification is a critical step in waste management that is time-consuming and necessitates automation to replace traditional approaches. Recently, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have gained attention from researchers seeking to automate waste classification by providing alternative computational techniques to address various waste-related challenges. Significant research on waste classification has emerged in recent years, reflecting the growing focus on this domain. This systematic literature review (SLR) explores the role of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), in automating waste classification. Using Kitchenham's and PRISMA guidelines, we analyze over 97 studies, categorizing AI-based techniques into ML-based, DL-based, and hybrid models. We further present an in-depth review of over fifteen publicly available waste classification datasets, highlighting key limitations such as dataset imbalance, real-world variability, and standardization issues. Our analysis reveals that deep learning and hybrid approaches dominate the current research landscape, with CNN-based architecture and transfer learning techniques showing particularly promising results. To guide future advancements, this study also proposes a structured roadmap that organizes challenges and opportunities into short-, mid-, and long-term priorities. The roadmap integrates insights on model accuracy, system efficiency, and sustainability goals to support the practical deployment of AI-powered waste classification systems. This work provides researchers with a comprehensive understanding of the state-of-the-art in ML and DL for waste classification and offers insights into areas that remain unexplored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.