ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Virtual Electroencephalogram Acquisition: A Review on Electroencephalogram Generative Methods.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-independent hybrid generative-discriminative modeling for seizure detection in long-term scalp EEG.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Minority class-aware multiclass arrhythmia detection using conditional GAN augmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- EEG Signal Classification with Data Augmentation for Epileptic Focus Localization and Deep Sleep Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and internal-external validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for multidrug resistance in mechanically ventilated ICU patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Addressing class imbalance in traumatic brain injury prognostication: A survey of resampling approaches.AIMS neuroscience · 2026Review
- A survey on data augmentation for EEG-based emotion recognition and cognitive workload decoding.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Trans-cVAE-GAN: Transformer-Based cVAE-GAN for High-Fidelity EEG Signal Generation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Driven by the remarkable capabilities of machine learning, brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are carving out an ever-expanding range of applications across a multitude of diverse fields. Notably, electroencephalogram (EEG) signals have risen to prominence as the most prevalently utilized signals within BCIs, owing to their non-invasive essence, exceptional portability, cost-effectiveness, and high temporal resolution. However, despite the significant strides made, the paucity of EEG data has emerged as the main bottleneck, preventing generalization of decoding algorithms. Taking inspiration from the resounding success of generative models in computer vision and natural language processing arenas, the generation of synthetic EEG data from limited recorded samples has recently garnered burgeoning attention. This paper undertakes a comprehensive and thorough review of the techniques and methodologies underpinning the generative models of the general EEG, namely the variational autoencoder (VAE), the generative adversarial network (GAN), and the diffusion model. Special emphasis is placed on their practical utility in augmenting EEG data. The structural designs and performance metrics of the different generative approaches in various application domains have been meticulously dissected and discussed. A comparative analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each existing model has been carried out, and prospective avenues for future enhancement and refinement have been put forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.