ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Can EMG-Derived Upper Limb Muscle Synergies Serve as Markers for Post-Stroke Motor Assessment and Prediction of Rehabilitation Outcome?
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intra- and Inter-Individual Spectral Pattern Variability of sEMG in Elbow Flexor Motor Tasks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- EMG-Spectrogram-Empowered CNN Stroke-Classifier Model Development.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automated EMG-Based Classification of Upper Extremity Motor Impairment Levels in Subacute Stroke.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
EMG-derived muscle synergy, as a representation of neuromotor modules utilized for motor control, has been proposed as a biomarker for stroke rehabilitation. Here, we evaluate the utility of muscle synergies for assessing motor function and predicting post-intervention motor outcome in a stroke rehabilitation clinical trial. Subacute stroke survivors (n = 59) received month-long acupuncture (Acu), sham acupuncture (ShamAcu) or no acupuncture (NoAcu) as adjunctive rehabilitative intervention alongside standard physiotherapy. Clinical scores and EMGs (14 muscles, eight motor tasks) were collected from the stroke-affected upper limb before and after intervention. We then extracted muscle synergies from EMGs using non-negative matrix factorization and designed 12 muscle synergy indices (MSIs) to summarize different aspects of post-stroke synergy features. All MSIs correlated with multiple clinical scores, suggesting that our indices could potentially serve as biomarkers for post-stroke motor functional assessments. While the intervention groups did not differ in their pre-to-post differences in the clinical scores, the inclusion of MSIs into analysis revealed that on average Acu promoted more recovery of synergy features than ShamAcu and NoAcu, though not all subjects in the group were Acu responders. We then built regression models using pre-intervention MSIs and clinical variables to predict the outcomes of Acu and NoAcu and showed by a preliminary retrospective simulation of patient stratification that MSI-based predictions could have led to better post-intervention motor improvement. Overall, we demonstrate that muscle synergies can potentially clarify the effects of interventions and assist in motor assessment, outcome prediction, and treatment selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.