Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40431961›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Supervised Scene Adaptive Model for Identifying Impact Load with Few Samples.

Shengbao Bai, Ji Yao, Chenhui Huang, Yuan Tian, Zhigang Xiong, Gang Chen, Hu Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shengbao BaiNational Key Laboratory of Structural Integrity, Aircraft Strength Research Institute of China, Xi'an 710065, China.
Ji YaoNational Key Laboratory of Ship Structural Safety, China Ship Scientific Research Center, Wuxi 214082, China.
Chenhui HuangSchool of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Yuan TianNational Key Laboratory of Structural Integrity, Aircraft Strength Research Institute of China, Xi'an 710065, China.
Zhigang XiongSchool of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Gang ChenSchool of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5465-032X
Hu SunSchool of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4272-3552

Funding

National Key Laboratory of Ship Structural Safety Naklas2024KF001-KNational Key Laboratory of Strength and Structural Integrity ASSIKFJJ202302005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning-based impact load identification technology for the next generation of large aircraft structures has garnered significant attention and has become one of the focal points in aircraft structural health monitoring. However, this technology relies on a large number of training samples and exhibits poor scalability. One of the current challenges in system-level multi-structure monitoring is how to construct deep learning models with a small number or even zero impact training samples, and improve the models' ability to migrate between different structures. To address this challenge, a novel method for impact load identification using only a small number of samples, based on a supervised scene adaptive model, is proposed. The performance of the model is validated on real aircraft structures. For large and complex structures, the model can be applied to other similar structural areas or different structural areas by using samples from the baseline area for training. Then, a very small number of calibration samples from the migrated area can be used for calibration. The results demonstrate that the proposed model, calibrated with just a single sample, achieves 97.22% accuracy in impact location identification and 99.44% accuracy in energy identification under similar regional structural conditions. Under different structural region conditions, the location identification accuracy of the proposed model is 87.65%, while the energy identification accuracy remains at 98.85%. The position identification accuracy of the model is 91.98% under different impact energy level conditions, and the identification accuracy remains at 87.04% even under varying impact energy levels and structural region conditions.

Indexed as

deep learningimpact load detectionscene adaptivestructural health monitoringtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID40431961
PMCPMC12116186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.