Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40431901›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Augmented Feedback in Post-Stroke Gait Rehabilitation Derived from Sensor-Based Gait Reports-A Longitudinal Case Series.

Gudrun M Johansson, Fredrik Öhberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gudrun M JohanssonDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1351-4425
Fredrik ÖhbergDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3363-7414

Funding

the Region Västerbotten and MedTech4Health 2016-02472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable sensors are increasingly used to provide objective quantification of spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters post-stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the practical value of sensor-based gait reports in delivering augmented feedback and informing the development of home training programmes following a 2-week supervised intensive intervention after stroke. Four patients with chronic stroke were assessed on four occasions (pre- and post-intervention, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups) using clinical gait tests, during which a portable sensor-based system recorded kinematic data. The meaningfulness of individual changes in gait parameters was interpreted based on established minimal detectable change values (MDC). Three participants improved their gait speed, joint angles, and/or cadence in the Ten-Metre Walk Test, and three participants improved their walking distance in the Six-Minute Walk Test. The improvements were most evident at the 3-month follow-up (with the most obvious changes above MDC estimates) and indicated the reappearance of normal gait patterns, adjustments of gait patterns, or a combination of both. Participants showed interest in and understanding of the information derived from the gait reports (ratings of 5-10 out of 10). In conclusion, augmented feedback derived from gait reports provides a valuable complement to traditional clinical assessments used in stroke rehabilitation to optimize treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

GaitStrokeStroke RehabilitationAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedWearable Electronic Devicesaugmented feedbackgaitkinematicsstrokewearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID40431901
PMCPMC12115626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.