Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40431893›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

EEG Baseline Analysis for Effective Extraction of P300 Event-Related Potentials for Welfare Interfaces.

Yuta Sasatake, Kojiro Matsushita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuta SasatakeIntelligent Production Technology Research & Development Center for Aerospace, Institute for Advanced Study, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193, Japan.
Kojiro MatsushitaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193, Japan.

Funding

JST SPRING JPMJSP2125THERS Make New Standards Program for the Next Generation Researchers Not Applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enabling individuals with complete paralysis to operate devices voluntarily requires an effective interface; EEG-based P300 event-related potential (ERP) interfaces are considered a promising approach. P300 is an EEG peak generated in response to specific sensory stimuli recognized by an individual. Accurate detection of this peak necessitates a stable pre-stimulus baseline EEG signal, which serves as the reference for baseline correction. Previous studies have commonly employed either a single-time-point amplitude (e.g., at 100 ms before stimulus onset) or a time-range-averaged amplitude over a specified pre-stimulus period (e.g., 0-200 ms) as a baseline correction method, assuming these provide the most stable EEG reference. However, in assistive P300 interfaces, continuous visual stimuli at 400 ms intervals are typically used to efficiently evoke P300 peaks. Since stimuli are presented before the EEG stabilizes, it remains unclear whether conventional neuroscience baseline correction methods are suitable for such applications. To address this, the present study conducted a P300 induction experiment based on continuous 400 ms interval visual stimuli. Using EEG data recorded from 0 to 1000 ms before each visual stimulus (sampled at 1 ms intervals), we applied three baseline correction methods-single-time-point amplitude, time-range-averaged amplitude, and multi-time-point amplitude-to determine the most effective EEG reference and evaluate the impact on P300 detection performance. The results showed that baseline correction using an amplitude at a single point in time is unstable when the basic EEG rhythm and low-frequency noise remain, while time-range-averaged baseline correction using the 0-200 ms pre-stimulus period led to relatively effective P300 detection. However, it was also found that using only one value averaged over the amplitude from 0 to 200 ms did not result in an accurate EEG reference potential, resulting in an error. Finally, this study confirmed that the multi-time-point baseline correction method, through which the amplitude state from 0 to 200 ms before the visual stimulus is comprehensively evaluated, may be the most effective method for P300 determination.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesElectroencephalographyEvent-Related Potentials, P300AdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedYoung AdultbaselineBCIEEGERP-P300

Identifiers

PMID40431893
PMCPMC12115947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.