ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Modeling and Evaluation of an Energy-Saving Backpack with Adjustable Stiffness.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Backpacks are widely used as an efficient and convenient means for manual load transportation. However, carrying heavy loads for a long time can significantly increase the risk of health issues. In response to the growing demand for relieving muscle fatigue, this paper proposes an energy-saving backpack that can adapt effectively to variable walking speeds and load masses. Inspired by the traditional bamboo pole commonly used for transporting goods, an energy-saving theory based on its mechanical characteristics is proposed. Guided by the theory, the backpack is designed with adjustable stiffness to enhance adaptability across different usage scenarios. Under the experimental conditions of a load of 12 kg and variable walking speeds, the backpack achieves a minimum reduction of 8.6% in the root mean square (RMS) value of gastrocnemius muscle activation. Furthermore, when the load increases from 9 kg to 12 kg, the net metabolic rate is reduced by an average of at least 14.3% compared to conventional backpacks. The experimental results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed backpack under variable conditions, demonstrating the high adaptability and flexibility that the energy-saving backpack provides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.