Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40431886›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Deep Learning Models for Multi-Part Morphological Segmentation and Evaluation of Live Unstained Human Sperm.

Peiran Lei, Mozafar Saadat, Mahdieh Gol Hassani, Chang Shu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peiran LeiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Mozafar SaadatDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Mahdieh Gol HassaniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0009-0009-7100-0124
Chang ShuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To perform accurate computer vision quality assessments of sperm used within reproductive medicine, a clear separation of each sperm component from the background is critical. This study systematically evaluates and compares the performance of Mask R-CNN, YOLOv8, YOLO11, and U-Net in multi-part sperm segmentation, focusing on the head, acrosome, nucleus, neck, and tail. This study conducts a quantitative analysis using a dataset of live, unstained human sperm, employing multiple metrics, including IoU, Dice, Precision, Recall, and F1 Score. The results indicate that Mask R-CNN outperforms other models in segmenting smaller and more regular structures (head, nucleus, and acrosome). In particular, it achieves a slightly higher IoU than YOLOv8 for the nucleus and surpasses YOLO11 for the acrosome, highlighting its robustness. For the neck, YOLOv8 performs comparably to or slightly better than Mask R-CNN, suggesting that single-stage models can rival two-stage models under certain conditions. For the morphologically complex tail, U-Net achieves the highest IoU, demonstrating the advantage of global perception and multi-scale feature extraction. These findings provide insights into model selection for sperm segmentation tasks, facilitating the optimization of segmentation architectures and advancing applications in assisted reproduction and biological image analysis.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSpermatozoaAcrosomeHumansMaleconvolutional neural networkdeep learninginfertilitysperm morphologysperm segmentation

Identifiers

PMID40431886
PMCPMC12115634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.