ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Enhancing Privacy in IoT-Enabled Digital Infrastructure: Evaluating Federated Learning for Intrusion and Fraud Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction: Deshmukh et al. Enhancing Privacy in IoT-Enabled Digital Infrastructure: Evaluating Federated Learning for Intrusion and Fraud Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Edge Transformer to IoT Decisions: Offloaded Embeddings for Lightweight Intrusion Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A comprehensive survey on securing the social internet of things: protocols, threat mitigation, technological integrations, tools, and performance metrics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- End-to-end deep learning for smart maritime threat detection: an AE-CNN-LSTM-based approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Challenges in implementing machine learning (ML) include expanding data resources within the finance sector. Banking data with significant financial implications are highly confidential. Diverse breaches and privacy violations can result from a combination of user information from different institutions for banking purposes. To address these issues, federated learning (FL) using a flower framework is utilized to protect the privacy of individual organizations while still collaborating through separate models to create a unified global model. However, joint training on datasets with diverse distributions can lead to suboptimal learning and additional privacy concerns. To mitigate this, established FL algorithms such as federated averaging (FedAvg), federated proximal (FedProx), and federated optimization (FedOpt), previously introduced in the literature, are evaluated in our study. These methods work with data locality during training at local clients without exposing data, while maintaining global convergence to enhance the privacy of local models within the framework. In this analysis, the UNSW-NB15 and credit datasets were employed, utilizing precision, recall, accuracy, F1-score, ROC, and AUC as performance indicators to demonstrate the effectiveness of applying FedAvg, FedProx, and FedOpt within the flower framework. The algorithms considered were subjected to an empirical study, which revealed significant performance benefits when using the flower framework. Consequently experiments were conducted over 50 rounds using the UNSW-NB15 dataset, which achieved accuracies of 99.87% for both FedAvg and FedProx and 99.94% for FedOpt. Similarly, with the credit dataset under the same conditions, FedAvg and FedProx achieved accuracies of 99.95% and 99.94%, respectively, while FedOpt also achieved comparable accuracy. These simulation-based results suggest that the proposed framework is effective on widely used benchmark datasets and, with further validation in deployed environments, has the potential to support secure and privacy-preserving collaborative machine learning across various domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.