ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Hands-Free Human-Machine Interfaces Using Piezoelectric Sensors and Accelerometers for Simulated Wheelchair Control in Older Adults and People with Physical Disabilities.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human-machine interface (HMI) systems are increasingly utilized to develop assistive technologies for individuals with disabilities and older adults. This study proposes two HMI systems using piezoelectric sensors to detect facial muscle activations from eye and tongue movements, and accelerometers to monitor head movements. This system enables hands-free wheelchair control for those with physical disabilities and speech impairments. A prototype wearable sensing device was also designed and implemented. Four commands can be generated using each sensor to steer the wheelchair. We conducted tests in offline and real-time scenarios to assess efficiency and usability among older volunteers. The head-machine interface achieved greater efficiency than the face-machine interface. The simulated wheelchair control tests showed that the head-machine interface typically required twice the time of joystick control, whereas the face-machine interface took approximately four times longer. Participants noted that the head-mounted wearable device was flexible and comfortable. Both modalities can be used for wheelchair control, especially the head-machine interface for patients retaining head movement. In severe cases, the face-machine interface can be used. Moreover, hybrid control can be employed to satisfy specific requirements. Compared to current commercial devices, the proposed HMIs provide lower costs, easier fabrication, and greater adaptability for real-world applications. We will further verify and improve the proposed devices for controlling a powered wheelchair, ensuring practical usability for people with paralysis and speech impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.