ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Variable Reduction Approach for Microbeams on Elastic Foundation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A General Finite Beam on Tensionless Foundation Model for Rail Track Characterization and Evaluation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Stability of a Compressed Bar Resting on an Elastic Substrate with Stepwise Changes in Parameters.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, the bending behavior of microbeams resting on elastic foundations is analyzed. Due to the widespread use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMSs) in sensing and actuation applications, various approaches have been developed for modeling such beams. Numerous specialized analytical and numerical models exist for specific configurations of beams and elastic foundations. This work proposes a novel approach. Separate models for the beam and the elastic foundation are developed using the finite element method. These models are then coupled using a variable reduction technique, in which only the degrees of freedom of the beam are retained in the solving system. This approach enables the coupling of any beam and foundation model and allows for independent refinement of the foundation mesh without increasing the size of the solving system. This method is particularly effective for analyzing configurations where the substrate exhibits nonlinear or non-homogeneous characteristics, or where gaps are present between the beam and the substrate. The nonlocal effects due to the small scale of the beam are also considered. This paper focuses on both the static deformation and frequency response of the microbeam. The proposed approach is validated against previously published models. Compared with existing models, the method presented here offers a simpler and more flexible formulation, while allowing the inclusion of nonlinearities in both the beam and foundation, as well as the modeling of gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.