SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Systematic Review of Sensor-Based Methods for Measurement of Eating Behavior.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- MediaPipe-Based Activity Analysis by Healthcare Professionals: Method Development and Technology Acceptance-A Pilot Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dietary Behavior, Physical Activity, and 24-Hour Rhythm Coherence: A Digital Phenotyping Perspective on Vascular and Glycemic Health.Nutrients · 2026Review
- A Video-Based Measurement Framework for Chewing-Event Detection Using 3D Facial Landmark Dynamics and sEMG-Based Reference Annotation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and usability of a mobile ecological momentary assessment platform for dietary surveillance in the U.S.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026Article
- Advances and opportunities in measuring dietary intake: from omics to AI.Nature metabolism · 2026Review
- A multimodal tableware system for supporting mindful eating in solo dining: a pilot study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The dynamic process of eating-including chewing, biting, swallowing, food items, eating time and rate, mass, environment, and other metrics-may characterize behavioral aspects of eating. This article presents a systematic review of the use of sensor technology to measure and monitor eating behavior. The PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed to review the full texts of 161 scientific manuscripts. The contributions of this review article are twofold: (i) A taxonomy of sensors for quantifying various aspects of eating behavior is established, classifying the types of sensors used (such as acoustic, motion, strain, distance, physiological, cameras, and others). (ii) The accuracy of measurement devices and methods is assessed. The review highlights the advantages and limitations of methods that measure and monitor different eating metrics using a combination of sensor modalities and machine learning algorithms. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of testing these methods outside of restricted laboratory conditions, and it highlights the necessity of further research to develop privacy-preserving approaches, such as filtering out non-food-related sounds or images, to ensure user confidentiality and comfort. The review concludes with a discussion of challenges and future trends in the use of sensors for monitoring eating behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.