Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40431762›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Systematic Review of Sensor-Based Methods for Measurement of Eating Behavior.

Delwar Hossain, J Graham Thomas, Megan A McCrory, Janine Higgins, Edward Sazonov

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Development and usability of a mobile ecological momentary assessment platform for dietary surveillance in the U.S.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Delwar HossainDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0271-9935
J Graham ThomasWeight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
Megan A McCroryDepartment of Health Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5024-1465
Janine HigginsDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Edward SazonovDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7792-4234

Funding

PILOT STUDY--SUBSTRATE METABOLISM IN EXTREMELY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT INFANTSP30DK048520 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI JANINE A HIGGINS · 1995 to 2026
$32.6M
Sensor-based Just-in Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) Targeting Eating BehaviorR01DK122473 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI SAZONOV, EDWARD S, THOMAS, JOHN GRAHAM · 2019 to 2022
$2.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK048520NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK122473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamic process of eating-including chewing, biting, swallowing, food items, eating time and rate, mass, environment, and other metrics-may characterize behavioral aspects of eating. This article presents a systematic review of the use of sensor technology to measure and monitor eating behavior. The PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed to review the full texts of 161 scientific manuscripts. The contributions of this review article are twofold: (i) A taxonomy of sensors for quantifying various aspects of eating behavior is established, classifying the types of sensors used (such as acoustic, motion, strain, distance, physiological, cameras, and others). (ii) The accuracy of measurement devices and methods is assessed. The review highlights the advantages and limitations of methods that measure and monitor different eating metrics using a combination of sensor modalities and machine learning algorithms. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of testing these methods outside of restricted laboratory conditions, and it highlights the necessity of further research to develop privacy-preserving approaches, such as filtering out non-food-related sounds or images, to ensure user confidentiality and comfort. The review concludes with a discussion of challenges and future trends in the use of sensors for monitoring eating behavior.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesFeeding BehaviorEatingHumansMachine LearningMonitoring, Physiologicdietary intakeeating behaviormeal microstructuresensortechnologywearable sensor

Identifiers

PMID40431762
PMCPMC12114971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.