Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40431760›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

NeuroSafeDrive: An Intelligent System Using fNIRS for Driver Distraction Recognition.

Ghazal Bargshady, Hakki Gokalp Ustun, Yasaman Baradaran, Houshyar Asadi, Ravinesh C Deo, Jeroen Van Boxtel, Raul Fernandez Rojas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ghazal BargshadyFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2557-7928
Hakki Gokalp UstunFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.
Yasaman BaradaranFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1870-7288
Houshyar AsadiInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovations (IISRI), Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3620-8693
Ravinesh C DeoArtificial Intelligence Applications Laboratory, School of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD 4300, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2290-6749
Jeroen Van BoxtelFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2643-0474
Raul Fernandez RojasFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8393-4241

Funding

University of Canberra faculty seed funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Driver distraction remains a critical factor in road accidents, necessitating intelligent systems for real-time detection. This study introduces a novel fNIRS-based method to to classify varying levels of driver distraction across diverse simulated scenarios, including cognitive, visual-manual, and auditory sources of inattention. Unlike previous work, we evaluated multiple neurophysiological metrics-including oxygenated, deoxygenated, and combined haemoglobin-to identify the most reliable biomarker for distraction detection. Neurophysiological data were collected, and three multi-class classifiers (SVM, KNN, decision tree) were applied across different fNIRS metrics. Our results show that oxygenated haemoglobin outperforms other signals in distinguishing distracted from non-distracted states, while the combined signal performs best in differentiating distraction from baseline. The proposed SVM model achieved ≈ 77.9% accuracy in detecting distracted and relaxed driving states based on brain oxygen levels. Our findings also show that increased distraction correlates with elevated activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and premotor cortex, whereas driving without distraction exhibits lower neurovascular engagement. This study contributes to affective computing and intelligent transportation systems and could support the development of future driver distraction monitoring systems for safer and more adaptive vehicle control.

Indexed as

AttentionAutomobile DrivingDistracted DrivingAdultBrainFemaleHumansIntelligent SystemsMaleSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredSupport Vector MachineYoung Adultdriver distraction detectiondriving simulatorfNIRShaemodynamic responseintelligent transportation systems

Identifiers

PMID40431760
PMCPMC12114941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.