ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Effect of Filtering on Signal Features of Equine sEMG Collected During Overground Locomotion in Basic Gaits.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In equine surface electromyography (sEMG), challenges related to the reliability and interpretability of data arise, among other factors, from methodological differences, including signal processing and analysis. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the filtering-induced changes in basic signal features in relation to the balance between signal loss and noise attenuation. Raw sEMG signals were collected from the quadriceps muscle of six horses during walk, trot, and canter and then filtered using eight filtering methods with varying cut-off frequencies (low-pass at 10 Hz, high-pass at 20 Hz and 40 Hz, and bandpass at 20-450 Hz, 40-450 Hz, 7-200 Hz, 15-500 Hz, and 30-500 Hz). For each signal variation, signal features-such as amplitude, root mean square (RMS), integrated electromyography (iEMG), median frequency (MF), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)-along with signal loss metrics and power spectral density (PSD), were calculated. High-pass filtering at 40 Hz and bandpass filtering at 40-450 Hz introduced significant filtering-induced changes in signal features while providing full attenuation of low-frequency noise contamination, with no observed differences in signal loss between these two methods. Other filtering methods led to only partial attenuation of low-frequency noise, resulting in lower signal loss and less consistent changes across gaits in signal features. Therefore, filtering-induced changes should be carefully considered when comparing signal features from studies using different filtering approaches. These findings may support cross-referencing in equine sEMG research related to training, rehabilitation programs, and the diagnosis of musculoskeletal diseases, and emphasize the importance of applying standardized filtering methods, particularly with a high-pass cut-off frequency set at 40 Hz.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.