ReviewVeterinary sciences2025
Zoonotic Agents in Farmed Fish: A Systematic Review from the Interdisciplinary Perspective of the One Health Concept.
Review in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Dangerous Prey Fish?Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence on zoonotic agents in farmed fish from the interdisciplinary One Health perspective. The review followed a protocol, following the PICOS strategy, where P represents population (farmed fish), I represents intervention (fish diseases), C represents comparison (healthy fish), O represents outcome (One Health) and S represents the type of study (experimental studies). The searches were conducted in the SCOPUS, Science Direct and PubMed Central databases. Of the 400 articles identified, 23 met the inclusion criteria due to their methodological robustness. These articles focused predominantly on parasitic (60.9%) and bacterial (39.1%) zoonotic agents. The One Health approaches discussed throughout the articles included host-parasite interactions (35%), antimicrobial resistance (22%), infections and food safety (18%), nutrition and immune responses (17%), stress and immune responses (4%) and anthelmintic testing (4%). The findings indicate that high-level scientific production is often confined to specific fields, such as veterinary medicine, biological sciences and animal science/fishery resources. There is a lack of broad interdisciplinary collaboration, limiting the integration of diverse fields to improve scientific production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.