Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Letícia Carolina Bortolanza SoaresDepartment of Animal Science, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6958-564X
Leticia Kim HuangDepartment of Animal Science, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-7513-4948
Germán Darío Ramírez-ZamudioDepartment of Animal Science, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4843-7653
Murilo Soler de MagistriDepartment of Animal Science, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0003-3019-8708
Joao Marcos Bovetto de Campos ValimDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Production, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Vinicius Laerte Silva HerreiraDepartment of Animal Bioscience, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2629-1312
Patricia Maloso RamosDepartment of Animal Science, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2154-7403
Carl Robertson DahlenCenter for Nutrition and Pregnancy, Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4556-4315
Nara Regina Brandão CônsoloDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Production, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Saulo Luz SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0849-9948
Paulo Roberto LemeDepartment of Animal Science, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5210-275X
Funding
Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/15219-7Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2023/13173-2
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) supplementation during the growing and finishing phases on Nellore bulls' performance, carcass traits, and meat quality. Fifty-two Nellore bulls were randomly assigned to four treatments: control (CON, without GAA) and three GAA levels (3, 6, and 9 g/kg dry matter [DM] in the growing supplement; 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 g/kg DM in the finishing diet). During the 280-day growing phase, bulls were kept in paddocks, while in the 74-day feedlot finishing phase, they were housed in collective pens. Body weight, average daily gain, and carcass ultrasound measurements were recorded in both phases. Feed intake was recorded daily during finishing, and carcass traits were evaluated post-slaughter. GAA supplementation during the growing phase did not affect performance or ultrasound carcass traits
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Guanidinoacetic Acid and Its Impact on the Performance, Carcass and Meat Quality of Growing and Finishing Nellore Cattle. · full record | OpenQuestion