Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40431513›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2025

Neural Network-Aided Milk Somatic Cell Count Increase Prediction.

Sára Ágnes Nagy, István Csabai, Tamás Varga, Bettina Póth-Szebenyi, György Gábor, Norbert Solymosi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sára Ágnes NagyDepartment of Physics of Complex Systems, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-0411-5887
István CsabaiDepartment of Physics of Complex Systems, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9232-9898
Tamás VargaCentre for Bioinformatics, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078 Budapest, Hungary.
Bettina Póth-SzebenyiDoctoral School of Animal Science, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 7400 Kaposvár, Hungary.
György GáborCentre for Bioinformatics, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078 Budapest, Hungary.
Norbert SolymosiDepartment of Physics of Complex Systems, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-1783-2041

Funding

European Union RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subclinical mastitis (SM) is the most economically damaging yet often visually undetectable disease of dairy cows. Early detection and treatment can reduce the loss caused by the disease; thus, the continuous improvement of SM diagnostic methods is necessary. Although milk's somatic cell count (SCC) is commonly measured for diagnostic purposes, its direct determination is not widely used in everyday practice. The primary objective of our work was to investigate whether the predictive value of SM diagnostics can be improved by training artificial neural networks (ANNs) on data generated using typical conventional milking systems. The best ANN classifier had a sensitivity of 0.54 and a specificity of 0.77, which is comparable to performances of various California Mastitis Tests (CMT) found in the literature. Combining two diagnostic tests, ANN and CMT, we concluded that the positive predictive value could be up to 50% higher than the value provided by the individual CMT. While implementing CMT is a labor-intensive process on herd-level, in milking machines where milk properties or milk yield data can be measured automatically, similar to our work, SCC-increase predictions for all individuals could be obtained daily basis.

Indexed as

artificial neural networkdairy cowelectrical conductivitymachine learningsomatic cell countsubclinical mastitis

Identifiers

PMID40431513
PMCPMC12115723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.