ArticleVeterinary sciences2025
Questionnaire-Based Survey Regarding the Rational Usage of Antimicrobial Agents in Food-Producing Animals in Romania.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interventions to Reduce Antibiotic Prescribing in Small Animal Veterinary Practice: Evidence and Clinical Impact.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Veterinary Bacterial Pathogens: Resistance Patterns, Zoonotic Risks and One Health Implications.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance Profile ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Aerobic Uterine Pathogens in Dairy Cattle: Surveillance and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles in Postpartum Endometritis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The annual rise in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health concern. This Romanian questionnaire-based survey aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of routine antimicrobial use by veterinary practitioners in food-producing animals and to gauge their concerns about AMR. To gather data, an online questionnaire with 28 questions was developed and distributed nationwide to veterinarians via the Google Drive network and Google Forms. Despite this increased awareness, deviations in antimicrobial administration persist, often due to insufficient knowledge about AMR and the mechanisms of antimicrobial action. This study underscores the urgent need for prudent antimicrobial use in livestock production in Romania.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.