Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40431062›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Digitally Quantifying Growth and Verdancy of

Mara B Depetris, Adam M Dimech, Kathryn M Guthridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Determination of Optimal Harvest Time inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mara B DepetrisAgriculture Victoria Research, Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8893-6855
Adam M DimechAgriculture Victoria Research, Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0533-1354
Kathryn M GuthridgeAgriculture Victoria Research, Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8044-6736

Funding

Dairy Australia (Australia) NADepartment of Energy, Environment and Climate Action, Victoria NAGardiner Foundation NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The image analysis of plants provides an opportunity to measure changes in growth and physiology quantitatively, and non-destructively, over time providing significant advantages over traditional methods of assessment which often rely on qualitative and subjective measures to distinguish between different treatments or genotypes in an experiment. Image analysis techniques are commonly deployed for the analysis of plants in the field or glasshouse, but few studies have demonstrated the use of image analysis to phenotype plants grown under aseptic conditions in culture media.

Indexed as

fescuegrassesimage analysisplant growth regulatorsryegrasstissue culture

Identifiers

PMID40431062
PMCPMC12115340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.