ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Agents for Fluorescence-Guided Glioblastoma Surgery.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-triggered platelet vehicles loading fluorescein for targeted sonodynamic therapy of glioblastoma.Drug delivery · 2026Article
- Advances in Preoperative and Intraoperative Technologies for Safe Resection of Gliomas in Cognitive Regions.Cancers · 2025Review
- The role of intraoperative flow cytometry on intracranial tumor surgery : a scoping review.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, characterized by rapid progression and a median survival of no more than 12-18 months. Fluorescence-guided surgery is crucial, as it allows for tumor visualization and aids in its complete removal, which is essential for improving survival rates. We conducted a literature review to identify fluorescent agents that have been utilized in the removal of GBM and to assess their benefits in achieving maximum tumor resection. Our analysis focuses on their advantages, limitations, and potential impact on improving surgical precision and patient outcomes. We searched the PubMed database for studies published on fluorescence-guided resection of GBM and evaluated the utility of each agent in terms of outcomes, gross total resection (GTR), and their sensitivity and specificity for the tumor. The literature review revealed that the three agents successfully utilized are 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), sodium fluorescein, and indocyanine green. In addition to these, a variety of dyes have been investigated in studies, including peptides, lipids, and nanosystems, which appear to be very promising. To date, numerous fluorescent agents have been proposed for the surgical resection of GBM. However, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) remains the only agent widely adopted in clinical practice, as its safety and efficacy have been well-established. Further clinical trials and studies are necessary to assess the utility, effectiveness, and potential advantages of emerging fluorescent dyes in enhancing GBM resection and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.